日本財団 図書館

共通ヘッダを読みとばす


Top > 産業 > 運輸.交通 > 成果物情報

2002年度欧州造船政策動向調査

 事業名 造船関連海外情報収集及び海外業務協力事業
 団体名 シップ・アンド・オーシャン財団  


付録20A TBR第2次報告書(英文)
(2000年7月)
 
Non-confidential
 
REPORT TO THE TRADE BARRIERS REGULATION COMMITTEE
 
EXAMINATION PROCEDURE CONCERNING AN OBSTACLE TO TRADE, WITHIN THE MEANING OF COUNCIL REGULATION (EC) No 3286/94, CONSISTING OF TRADE PRACTICES MAINTAINED BY KOREA AFFECTING TRADE IN COMMERCIAL VESSELS
 
SUPPLEMENTARY REPORT ON EXPORT SUBSIDIES
 
COMPLAINT SUBMITTED BY:
COMMITTEE OF EUROPEAN UNION SHIPBUILDERS ASSOCIATIONS
(CESA)
 
ACRONYMS
 
KEXIM: Korean Export Import Bank
GOK: Government of Korea
KDB: Korean Development Bank
ASCM: Agreement On Subsidies And Countervailing Measures
 
the Arrangement: OECD Arrangement on Guidelines for Officially Supported Export Credits
the Understanding: Sector Understanding on Export Credits for Ships
 
IP: Investigation period (1 January 1997-30 November 2000)
 
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
A. Introduction
On 24 October 2000, CESA lodged a complint pursuant to Articles 3 and 4 of Council Regulation 3286/94 (the Trade Barriers "TBR" Regulation) against subsidies granted to Korean shipbuilding companies in violation of Articles 3 and 5 of the WTO Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures ("ASCM"). The Commission, after consulting the TBR Committee, initiated the investigation oh 2 December 2000.
 
The Commission's TBR investigation report was presented to the Member States Advisory Committee on 8 May 2001. The investigation showed that Korea has granted substantial amounts of subsidies, mainly through export schemes by the state owned Korean Export-Import Bank (KEXIM) and debt forgiveness and debt-to-equity swaps by government owned or government controlled financial institutions. Furthermore there was evidence that the subsidies in question were causing adverse effects to EU industry within the meaning of the WTO Subsidies Agreement and were, therefore, actionable.
 
With regard to the KEXIM programmes, on the basis of facts available, it was considered that the GOK has granted prohibited export subsidies under Article 3 of the ASCM to all Korean shipyards. The Commission stated, however, that it would continue its investigation into the export subsidy schemes on which the Korean authorities and shipyards did not supply crucial information and that a further report on these schemes as well as on their impact would be released in due course.
 
B. The challenged practices
(i)Export loans to Domestic Suppliers
KEXIM provides loans to Korean shipyards in case a shipyard has agreed deferred payment terms with a foreign buyer.
 
The information available cannot lead to a conclusion on whether KEXIM respects, or not, the provisions of the OECD Understanding on ships. In view, however, of the limited impact of the scheme, it is not considered necessary to draw a conclusion on this issue.
 
(ii)Pre-shipment Loans
KEXIM provides pre-delivery loans to shipyards to finance shipbuilding production costs, such as raw material cost, labour and overheads until delivery of the ships. Pre-shipment loans constitute direct subsidies contingent upon export falling under paragraph (a) of Annex I of the ASCM.
 
The availability of pre-shipment loans is particularly injurious as it provides a direct competitive advantage to Korean shipbuilders. Pre-shipment loans permit yards to offer buyers low prices in conjunction with attractive payment terms.
 
(iii)Advance payment refund guarantees
KEXIM provides a guarantee that a foreign buyer will be refunded any advance payments given to a Korean shipyard, inc luding any accrued interest on the advance payments, in case the Korean shipyard fails to perform its obligations under the relevant contract. The APRG programme constitutes a prohibited subsidy under Article 3.1 (a) ASCM.
 
A refund guarantee facility is a very important source of working capital for a yard. Unless a shipyard is able to arrange such a guarantee from a bank it would be highly unlikely for a buyer to conclude a contract. Consequently, although the amount of the actual benefit of a subsidised guarantee scheme might be small in proportion to the overall price of a ship, its impact is far greater as its very existence is decisive for concluding a contract.
 
C. Conclusion
The evidence available leads to the conclusion that the KEXIM "pre-shipment loan" and "advance payment guarantee" programmes led to the granting of subsidies within the meaning of Article 1 of the ASCM to Korean shipbuilders.
 
The KEXIM subsidies in question are de jure export contingent within the meaning of Article 3 of the ASCM and therefore, in accordance with Article 2.3, specific.
 
D. Recommendation
The Commission is in the process of discussions with the Korean authorities in order to obtain the withdrawal of the subsidies or the removal of the adverse effects. Unless such a solution is achieved amicably the initiation of a procedure within the framework of the WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding, and more particularly pursuant to the relevant provisions of the ASCM, might be required.







サイトに関するご意見・ご質問・お問合せ   サイトマップ   個人情報保護

日本財団会長笹川陽平ブログはこちら



ランキング
注目度とは?
成果物アクセスランキング
753位
(32,233成果物中)

成果物アクセス数
13,398

集計期間:成果物公開〜現在
更新日: 2020年5月23日

関連する他の成果物

1.Shipbuilding in Japan 2002
2.東南アジア造船関連レポート21
3.米国テロ事件後の海事セキュリティ対策の動向
4.中国造船業の概況<2001年>
5.米国における船舶のバリアフリー化推進に関する調査
6.米国のエネルギー政策が海事産業に与える影響に関する調査
7.米国における船舶のクリーン推進システム開発プロジェクトに関する調査
8.米国における造船関係研究開発助成制度の実施状況と成果活用等に関する調査
9.英国における統合的海洋管理政策に関する基礎調査
10.WTO加盟後の中国造船・舶用工業に関する調査
11.中東地域造船需要動向調査
12.タイ国におけるモーダルシフトに伴う新規造船需要に関する調査?実現に向けて?
13.船舶解撤の新たな進展と今後の展望
14.中国の造船・舶用工業政策に関する調査
15.海運・造船における電子商取引の現状と展望
16.中国造船業の概況(華北)
17.欧州における船舶からの排出ガス削減対策に関する動向調査
18.東南アジア造船関連レポート22
19.東南アジア・オセアニア地域における旅客船参入手法に関する調査
20.「海と船の企画展」統一ポスター
  [ 同じカテゴリの成果物 ]


アンケートにご協力
御願いします

この成果物は
お役に立ちましたか?


とても役に立った
まあまあ
普通
いまいち
全く役に立たなかった


この成果物をどのような
目的でご覧になりましたか?


レポート等の作成の
参考資料として
研究の一助として
関係者として参照した
興味があったので
間違って辿り着いただけ


ご意見・ご感想

ここで入力されたご質問・資料請求には、ご回答できません。






その他・お問い合わせ
ご質問は こちら から